Flexible Pavement Design Using MDP 2024 and Asphalt Institute
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37577/sainteks.v8i02.1185Keywords:
Flexible Pavement, MDP 2024, The Asphalt Institute, Pavement-PastDean, CESAAbstract
Accurate flexible pavement thickness design is essential for structural reliability, particularly under high heavy-vehicle traffic and Over Dimension Over Load (ODOL) conditions that may accelerate fatigue cracking and rutting. This study compares pavement thickness, structural responses, and estimated service life obtained using the 2024 Pavement Design Manual (MDP 2024) and the Asphalt Institute method, supported by Pavement-PastDean, under three planned traffic-load scenarios of 5, 15, and 60 million CESA. The analysis uses actual field subgrade CBR data from Jalan Simpang Maruyung, Kutamandiri, Tanjungsari, Sumedang Regency, with a design CBR of 9%, selected from the lowest of three field measurements. Both methods produced pavement structures that met the design criteria in all scenarios. At 5 million CESA, the total thicknesses were 300 mm for MDP 2024 and 450 mm for the Asphalt Institute; at 15 million CESA, they were 385 mm and 505 mm, respectively; and at 60 million CESA, both converged to 540 mm. At 5 million CESA, estimated service life was 6.41 million CESA for MDP 2024 and 7.17 million CESA for the Asphalt Institute, while at 15 million CESA the values were 20.43 and 18.48 million CESA, respectively. At 60 million CESA, MDP 2024 produced an extreme value of 980,184.82 million CESA versus 79.35 million CESA for the Asphalt Institute. This extreme value is attributed to the transfer-function formulation after the AC-Base tensile strain decreased to 7.499 microstrain due to the stiff cement-treated base (CTB, E = 3,000 MPa), and should not be interpreted as evidence of superior rutting performance because both methods produced the same subgrade compressive strain. Overall, the relative performance of the two methods varied with traffic level, indicating a nonlinear relationship between load level and predicted pavement performance.
Downloads
References
Alya, D., Sulandari, E., & Azwansyah, H. (2025). Perencanaan Tebal Perkerasan Lentur di Jalan Rasau Jaya-Sungai Bulan, Kabupaten Kubu Raya Dengan Metode MDP 2024. Jurnal Serambi Engineering, X(4), 15210–15218.
Ardana A, Wudda A.R, Pasaribu R, Mayori K, Marwan A, S. D. (2025). Tracking System Pada Perusahaan J & T Express?: Pengembangan Teknologi Tracking Sebagai Solusi. Ilmiah Mahasiswa (STEBIS), 5, 61–76.
Bandung, I. T. (2026). Pavement-PastDean [Perangkat lunak komputer]. Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Carvalho, R. L., & Schwartz, C. W. (2006). Comparisons of flexible pavement designs: AASHTO empirical versus NCHRP Project 1-37A mechanistic-empirical. Transportation Research Record, 1947(1), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106194700116.
Institute, A. (1983). Thickness Design—Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets. Asphalt Institute.
Kementerian PUPR Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga. (2024). Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan No. 03/BM/M/2024.
Kosasih, D. (2025). Perancangan struktur perkerasan lentur jalan berdasarkan pendekatan mekanistik.
Li, Q., Xiao, D. X., Wang, K. C. P., Hall, K. D., & Qiu, Y. (2011). Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG): A bird’s-eye view. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (English Edition),. 114–133.
Parianto, P., Sulandari, E., & Mukti, E. T. (2025). Metode pelaksanaan perencanaan desain tebal perkerasan lentur dengan menggunakan metode Bina Marga 2024. JeLAST: Jurnal Teknik Kelautan, PWK, Sipil, dan Tambang, 12(3).
Patiku, M., Lolo, D. P., & Utary, C. (2024). Perencanaan Perkerasan Lentur Menggunakan Metode Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan. Musamus Journal of Civil Engineering, 8(1).
Rafi Sugema, M., & Robi Maulana. (2025). Analisis Perbandingan Perencanaan Tebal Perkerasan Jalan Lentur Menggunakan Metode AASHTO 1993 dan MDP 2024 dalam Konteks Kebijakan Transportasi Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Teknik: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Aplikasi Teknik, 23(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.55893/jt.vol23no2.683
Rochma Riyani, Y., Nusantoro, A., & Setyaning, tari. (2025). Analisis Tebal Perkerasan Lentur dengan Metode Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan dan AASHTO 1993 (Studi Kasus: Ruas Jalan Kenteng-Bencorejo STA 7+000 sampai STA 8+000). Jurnal Surya Beton, 9(1), 46–57. https://jurnal.umpwr.ac.id/index.php/suryabeton
Saudy, M., Breakah, T., Kaloop, M. R., & El-Badawy, S. (2023). Regional implementation of the mechanistic empirical pavement design and analysis approach: Egyptian case study. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18(December 2022), e01863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01863
Thompson, M. R. (1996). Mechanistic-empirical flexible pavement design: An overview. Transportation Research Record, 1539(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196153900101.
Wibawa, I. P. C., Ariawan, I. M. A., & Winaya, P. K. (2025). Analisis Perbandingan Tebal Struktur Perkerasan Jalan Kaku Menggunakan Metode AASHTO 1993, Pd T–14–2003, dan MDP 2024. Reinforcement Review in Civil Engineering Studies and Management, 4(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.38043/reinforcement.v4i2.7155








